<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969</id><updated>2011-11-27T19:55:23.324-05:00</updated><category term='acquisition'/><category term='sirius'/><category term='reform'/><category term='media'/><category term='confidential sources'/><category term='cross ownership'/><category term='radio'/><category term='Internet'/><category term='diversity'/><category term='cable'/><category term='FCC regulation'/><category term='competition'/><category term='satillite radio'/><category term='media ownership'/><category term='television'/><category term='newspapers'/><category term='xm'/><category term='murdoch'/><category term='media economics'/><category term='news corporation'/><category term='shield laws'/><category term='ownership'/><category term='consolidation'/><category term='media monopoly'/><category term='bundle'/><category term='satellite'/><category term='journalism'/><category term='advertsing'/><category term='merger'/><category term='media competition'/><category term='open society'/><title type='text'>Ben Compaine's Who Owns the Media?</title><subtitle type='html'>This forum is about media ownership and competition.  They are two sides of the coin. As more competition is generally viewed as better than less, I favor speaking about the degree of competition in the media industry.</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>67</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-8830869204980822511</id><published>2010-06-21T11:31:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2010-06-21T11:32:38.993-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media ownership'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='FCC regulation'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='cross ownership'/><title type='text'>FCC asks: Do media ownership limits make sense?</title><summary type='text'>"Even the news industry's free fall probably will not be enough to wipe out complicated federal rules designed to restrain the power of media companies," is the conclusion of an Associated Press analysis of the forthcoming FCC's mandated quadrennial review of its ownership regulations.

Although the legacy media companies are "no longer the almighty players that they were when the ownership rules</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/8830869204980822511/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=8830869204980822511&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/8830869204980822511'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/8830869204980822511'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2010/06/fcc-asks-do-media-ownership-limits-make.html' title='FCC asks: Do media ownership limits make sense?'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_K3nPLi-F-gg/TB-ESXrjI4I/AAAAAAAABL0/98r8Ce6l-Wo/s72-c/media_trends.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-2055149154820606596</id><published>2009-01-10T22:23:00.011-05:00</published><updated>2009-01-10T22:42:09.174-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Google Trends suggests that interest in media ownership on decline, especially compared to the economy</title><summary type='text'>How important is the subject of media ownership? As with so many questions, the answer is, relative to what? And to whom?Google not only answers our questions, such as “Who owns the media?”, but thanks to its scale of use, can also tell us what users are concerned about. Google keeps track of the more than 31 billion searches made through it facility each month. And thanks to a wonderful tool it </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/2055149154820606596/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=2055149154820606596&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/2055149154820606596'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/2055149154820606596'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2009/01/google-trends-suggests-that-interest-in.html' title='Google Trends suggests that interest in media ownership on decline, especially compared to the economy'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_K3nPLi-F-gg/SWlntAIXyWI/AAAAAAAAAHE/AarnaBC6SXc/s72-c/google+trend+media+owership.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-4606734122993650079</id><published>2008-08-08T15:43:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-08-08T15:55:43.938-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media ownership'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media monopoly'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media competition'/><title type='text'>Matt Welch takes media reformistas to task for hypocrisy</title><summary type='text'>Matt Welch, in a post at Reason, pinpoints the hypocrisy of the media reformistas movement. Given what Welch documents they are on the record as lamenting—-the faceless corporate control of newspapers, the cost-cutting pressures that come with being a publicly traded newspaper company, the lack of local ownership (and concern with local affairs that comes with it) and, above all, the trend of </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/4606734122993650079/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=4606734122993650079&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/4606734122993650079'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/4606734122993650079'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2008/08/matt-welch-takes-media-reformistas-to.html' title='Matt Welch takes media reformistas to task for hypocrisy'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-6293564801525975366</id><published>2008-03-28T16:13:00.011-04:00</published><updated>2008-11-15T08:26:35.294-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='xm'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='sirius'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='satillite radio'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media competition'/><title type='text'>It took too long, but Justice understood Sirius-XM market perfectly</title><summary type='text'>A few months back I was visiting with my sister-in-law in Western  Missouri. I offered to tag along as she drove for a few errands. I also wanted to get a feel for her spanking new Hyundai. While waiting in the car I fiddled with the radio that included an XM Satellite Radio. I couldn’t tune in anything except the conventional local stations.    As we continued on to the next stop I ask her why </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/6293564801525975366/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=6293564801525975366&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/6293564801525975366'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/6293564801525975366'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2008/03/it-took-too-long-but-justice-understood.html' title='It took too long, but Justice understood Sirius-XM market perfectly'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_K3nPLi-F-gg/R-1bEedBafI/AAAAAAAAABc/X5a8uJ_ghqU/s72-c/Chart-Media+Use+Trends+3+copy.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-1863324093590008662</id><published>2008-03-21T17:35:00.016-04:00</published><updated>2008-11-15T08:26:35.446-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='cable'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='bundle'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media competition'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media economics'/><title type='text'>Why Cable Prices Seem To have Increased So Rapidly</title><summary type='text'>When a candy bar manufacturer has higher costs it can raise prices by giving less. The 3 ounce bar becomes the 2.75 ounce bar. This in effect is an 8% price increase. But the increase is not as painful because our expenditure stays constant.The print media can do the same to a point. They can reduce the news hole (ratio of editorial content to advertising), even reduce the number of pages, while </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/1863324093590008662/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=1863324093590008662&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/1863324093590008662'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/1863324093590008662'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2008/03/why-cable-prices-seem-to-have-increased.html' title='Why Cable Prices Seem To have Increased So Rapidly'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_K3nPLi-F-gg/R-QxcOdBabI/AAAAAAAAAA8/oefoMLnp3Dk/s72-c/cable+price+graph.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-7770933270942522152</id><published>2008-01-31T22:42:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-01-31T22:50:32.628-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='open society'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='shield laws'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='confidential sources'/><title type='text'>Is it a "Confidential" or  "Free and Open" Society?</title><summary type='text'>Though a bit off-topic from the usual subject matter of this Blog, I couldn’t resist highlighting the following statement from Martha K. Levin, executive vice president and publisher of the Free Press, which published James Risen’s 2006 book, State of War.      Mr. Risen, a reporter for The New York Times, was issued a subpoena by a federal grand jury apparently to try to force him to reveal his </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/7770933270942522152/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=7770933270942522152&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/7770933270942522152'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/7770933270942522152'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2008/01/is-it-confidential-or-free-and-open.html' title='Is it a &quot;Confidential&quot; or  &quot;Free and Open&quot; Society?'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-921322320978230463</id><published>2008-01-03T12:44:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-01-07T21:32:10.953-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='competition'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='newspapers'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media ownership'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media monopoly'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media competition'/><title type='text'>Retiring WSJ Managing Editor Says High Profits Created  Newspaper Industry’s “Golden Age”</title><summary type='text'>Today is the last day on the job for Paul Steiger, who has been the managing editor of The Wall Street Journal, for the past 16 years. That’s an impressive run by any standard.      Last Saturday the Journal published his valedictory on the front page under the headline “Read All About It: How newspapers got into such a fix, and where they go from here.” (Sub. still required)    It is a marvelous</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/921322320978230463/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=921322320978230463&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/921322320978230463'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/921322320978230463'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2008/01/retiring-wsj-managing-editor-says-high.html' title='Retiring WSJ Managing Editor Says High Profits Created  Newspaper Industry’s “Golden Age”'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-7799360410117217980</id><published>2007-11-09T16:34:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-04-03T22:13:46.810-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Senate's Media Ownership Crusade: Ignores Research, Will Have Unintended Consequences</title><summary type='text'>Perhaps the most disappointing aspect of the Senate’s latest misguided efforts to prevent the Federal Communications Commission from doing its job is the ignorance—or worse—ignoring— by the Senators of the solid data available to guide it.  In a hearing on November 8 on "Localism, Diversity, and Media Ownership," the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation loaded up the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/7799360410117217980/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=7799360410117217980&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/7799360410117217980'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/7799360410117217980'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2007/11/senates-media-ownership-crusade-ignores.html' title='Senate&apos;s Media Ownership Crusade: Ignores Research, Will Have Unintended Consequences'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-2422406386766149864</id><published>2007-11-01T12:30:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-11-01T16:26:16.799-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media ownership'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='murdoch'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='diversity'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media competition'/><title type='text'>Slate's Shafer "Defends" Murdoch. But it's Really About Encouraging Choice and Diversity</title><summary type='text'>Jack Shafer, who authors the Pressbox column for Slate,  wrote “In Defense of Rupert Murdoch” last Friday that Murdoch is “not as bad as some people make him out to be—people like Federal Communications Commission member Michael J. Copps.” In an open letter to the FCC Chairman Kevin Martin, Copps says that in buying Dow Jones, “For residents of the local New York metropolitan area, it will also </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/2422406386766149864/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=2422406386766149864&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/2422406386766149864'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/2422406386766149864'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2007/11/slates-shafer-defends-murdoch-but-its.html' title='Slate&apos;s Shafer &quot;Defends&quot; Murdoch. But it&apos;s Really About Encouraging Choice and Diversity'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-4053338754756265913</id><published>2007-10-03T10:59:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-10-17T11:59:26.626-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='news corporation'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='murdoch'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='consolidation'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media monopoly'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media competition'/><title type='text'>WOTM FAQ #4:  Is the debate about media concentration you are having with other scholars fun and stimulating?</title><summary type='text'>A FAQ series featuring some real questions I have answered from time to time.It’s been awhile since I last added to my FAQ. The above is based on the opening line of a recent email I received from a graduate student. Following is my response.I can assure you that the subject of media competition and its effects is not a simple academic debate among scholars. This is a high stakes issue. The </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/4053338754756265913/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=4053338754756265913&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/4053338754756265913'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/4053338754756265913'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2007/10/wotm-faq-4-is-debate-about-media.html' title='WOTM FAQ #4:  Is the debate about media concentration you are having with other scholars fun and stimulating?'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-8931316184688037813</id><published>2007-07-13T11:39:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-08-31T18:08:30.845-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='news corporation'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media ownership'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='murdoch'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='merger'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='acquisition'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media competition'/><title type='text'>News Corp. as an acquirer is limited by family ownership</title><summary type='text'>While the outcome of News Corporation’s audacious bid to acquire Dows Jones  continues to percolate, it might also be timely to look at News Corp. as an acquirer of media companies over time. Despite the image perpetrated by the company’s vocal detractors, News Corp is actually one of the few large media companies that has  been much more of a creator and builder of media outlets than an acquirer</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/8931316184688037813/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=8931316184688037813&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/8931316184688037813'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/8931316184688037813'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2007/07/news-corp-as-acquirer-is-limited-by.html' title='News Corp. as an acquirer is limited by family ownership'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-4694986356893779447</id><published>2007-04-06T15:58:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-11-15T08:26:35.839-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='newspapers'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media ownership'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='advertsing'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media competition'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='television'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Internet'/><title type='text'>Flow chart and new ad data reinforces competition and fragmentation in the media industry</title><summary type='text'>I posted an entry today at the Rebuilding Media site which was primarily focused on media strategy.                         Figure 1However, I can use much the same data to further bolster the point that the media industry today is far more open and competitive than ever. Although Figures 1 and 2, originally created by Winnipeg-based Ken Goldstein of Communications Management, repurposed here, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/4694986356893779447'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/4694986356893779447'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2007/04/flow-chart-and-new-ad-data-reinforces.html' title='Flow chart and new ad data reinforces competition and fragmentation in the media industry'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_K3nPLi-F-gg/RhanxlytbxI/AAAAAAAAAAM/WK4NSV_Ltd8/s72-c/tv+value+chain_1975.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-1598190702740613860</id><published>2007-03-02T09:55:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-04-06T17:54:04.429-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='radio'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='satellite'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media monopoly'/><title type='text'>Media “Monopoly” as seen from the real world</title><summary type='text'>You don't have to be an economist to intuitively know that close substitutes can act as very effective competition. Remember pop in glass bottles? When the only choice for diapers was to wash poopie cloth? When television news meant three broadcast networks? When music had to be distributed on vinyl?      The media debate du jour is whether a merger of two satellite radio providers, Sirius and XM</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/1598190702740613860/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=1598190702740613860&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/1598190702740613860'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/1598190702740613860'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2007/03/media-monopoly-as-seen-from-real-world.html' title='Media “Monopoly” as seen from the real world'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-3972052837842979328</id><published>2007-02-20T08:15:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-10-09T10:38:57.966-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='competition'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='merger'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='satillite radio'/><title type='text'>Sirius/XM Merger Proposal: The two sides of the pancake.</title><summary type='text'>The two satellite radio providers, XM and Sirius, announced a proposed merger yesterday.  The FCC, which must approve such a combination, quite reasonably went on record as having reservations. Chairman Kevin Martin added that “the hurdle here, however, would be high as the commission originally prohibited one company from holding the only two satellite radio licenses." What’s reasonable here? On</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/3972052837842979328/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=3972052837842979328&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/3972052837842979328'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/3972052837842979328'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2007/02/siriusxm-merger-proposal-two-sides-of.html' title='Sirius/XM Merger Proposal: The two sides of the pancake.'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-7427846083334358916</id><published>2007-02-09T11:29:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-02-15T21:40:08.533-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='competition'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='ownership'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='reform'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media'/><title type='text'>Columbia Forum Yields No Answers But Highlights Ambiguities on Media Ownership Issue</title><summary type='text'>The mini-symposium at Columbia  Journalism School yesterday on Media Reform: Is it Good for Journalism? was barely a toe-in-the-water event. Still, for anyone who was seriously interested in both sides of the pancake of the so-called media reform debate, it provided more grist for the mill than the three day one dimensional pep rally that the movement holds annually, mostly recently last month in</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/7427846083334358916/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=7427846083334358916&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/7427846083334358916'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/7427846083334358916'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2007/02/columbia-forum-yields-no-answers-but.html' title='Columbia Forum Yields No Answers But Highlights Ambiguities on Media Ownership Issue'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-3665970120675034668</id><published>2007-02-07T21:53:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-03-11T22:02:39.534-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='journalism'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='competition'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='ownership'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='consolidation'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media'/><title type='text'>What Media Consolidation?  Whose Quality Journalism? Response Below</title><summary type='text'>I was asked by a documentary film maker if I would agree to be interviewed for a film on the media ownership issue, specifically the FCC hearings that are being held around the country. I was asked:Our major focus is how consolidation affects journalism. Is quality journalism  declining, morphing,  getting better? Does it have any affect at all? My response follows:Well, I remain a bit hesitant. </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/3665970120675034668/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=3665970120675034668&amp;isPopup=true' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/3665970120675034668'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/3665970120675034668'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2007/02/what-media-consolidation-whose-quality.html' title='What Media Consolidation?  Whose Quality Journalism? Response Below'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-3007131394961482698</id><published>2007-02-02T17:55:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2007-02-02T18:14:07.227-05:00</updated><title type='text'>“Media Reform: Is It Good for Journalism?” at Columbia J-School Feb 8</title><summary type='text'>I will be a participant at Columbia University’s School of Journalism  mini-conference next Thursday, Feb 8 it’s labeling “Media Reform: Is It Good for Journalism?”  The keynote speaker is Walter Cronkite.  (See Slate’s Jack Shafer on “media reform.”)     The latest information is that there will be two panels. I will be part of one, on Media Competition (they call it media concentration), which </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/3007131394961482698/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=3007131394961482698&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/3007131394961482698'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/3007131394961482698'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2007/02/media-reform-is-it-good-for-journalism.html' title='“Media Reform: Is It Good for Journalism?” at Columbia J-School Feb 8'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-7580064062562637969</id><published>2007-01-11T14:38:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-01-11T16:14:07.245-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Slate Further Questions the Minot-Clear Channel Urban Legend</title><summary type='text'>Back in June 2005 I wrote about the Urban Legend that was growing up about the events surrounding a toxic gas spill in the area of Minot,  ND and the supposed lack of responsiveness of the six radio stations owned by Clear Channel Communications in Minot. The media reform (sic) movement has used this story as the poster child  for all that they claim is wrong about the state of media ownership in</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/7580064062562637969/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=7580064062562637969&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/7580064062562637969'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/7580064062562637969'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2007/01/slate-further-questions-minot-clear.html' title='Slate Further Questions the Minot-Clear Channel Urban Legend'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-116364525358606890</id><published>2006-11-15T21:40:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-11-15T21:50:42.126-05:00</updated><title type='text'>"Media Tracker" a useful tool for identifying media competitors by locality</title><summary type='text'>A useful research tool has been relaunched by the Center for Public Integrity as part of its Telecom and Media Ownership Project.  Dubbed Media Tracker, it’s an enhanced data base that identifies media outlets in any geographic area as well as the ownership of each outlet. The data base includes newspapers, television, radio, cable and broadband providers.So, for example, if you want to see the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/116364525358606890/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=116364525358606890&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/116364525358606890'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/116364525358606890'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2006/11/media-tracker-useful-tool-for.html' title='&quot;Media Tracker&quot; a useful tool for identifying media competitors by locality'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-116310049230340111</id><published>2006-11-09T14:22:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-04-12T22:29:26.144-04:00</updated><title type='text'>NSF-Funded Study Finds Newspaper “Slant” Comes from Readers, Not from Owner</title><summary type='text'>Once again, does ownership matter? A new, comprehensive, methodically unbiased study from two academic economists asks the question: “What Drives Media Slant?” Using robust statistical tools and a novel approach to measure “slant,” this National Science Foundation-funded study found that the largest single variable is that “Firms respond strongly to consumer preferences.” That is, to the extent </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/116310049230340111/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=116310049230340111&amp;isPopup=true' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/116310049230340111'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/116310049230340111'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2006/11/nsf-funded-study-finds-newspaper-slant.html' title='NSF-Funded Study Finds Newspaper “Slant” Comes from Readers, Not from Owner'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-115947536523197813</id><published>2006-09-28T16:29:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2006-09-29T12:07:15.540-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Cutting profit margins for newspapers only a short term fix</title><summary type='text'>Cutting “expected” profit margins for newspapers will not prevent long term downsizing of newspaper expenses.In a post I made today at Rebuilding Media I talk about the inevitability of downsizing at newspapers. I suggest you read that before continuing here, though it’s not necessary.There is no doubt that newspapers need to downsize to reflect both their shrinking circulation and their stagnant</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/115947536523197813/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=115947536523197813&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/115947536523197813'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/115947536523197813'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2006/09/cutting-profit-margins-for-newspapers.html' title='Cutting profit margins for newspapers only a short term fix'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-115697391549667431</id><published>2006-08-30T17:38:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2006-08-30T17:58:52.393-04:00</updated><title type='text'>FCC Pursues New (Yawn) Ownership Rules. Does Anyone Who Matters Care?</title><summary type='text'>As the FCC gears up for a new stab at concocting media ownership limits, the big media companies are continuing to downsize, resize, divest and diversify. To a great extent they look out over the highly competitive media landscape and do not see the FCC being as relevant to their future as many of the high profile media bashing critics seem to believe.The break up of Knight-Ridder, the second </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/115697391549667431/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=115697391549667431&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/115697391549667431'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/115697391549667431'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2006/08/fcc-pursues-new-yawn-ownership-rules.html' title='FCC Pursues New (Yawn) Ownership Rules. Does Anyone Who Matters Care?'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-115090721837526957</id><published>2006-06-21T12:26:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2006-06-21T12:38:50.353-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Big Media Critics Needn't Worry so Much</title><summary type='text'>Alan Murray, who writes on politics for The Wall Street Journal, has a column (page 2) today with the above headline. I’d like to run the whole thing here, as some readers of this Blog may not subscribe to the print or online version of the Journal (though I have stated many times that an online subscription is one of the best uses I can think of for $50 so long as you have lunch money set aside)</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/115090721837526957/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=115090721837526957&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/115090721837526957'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/115090721837526957'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2006/06/big-media-critics-neednt-worry-so-much.html' title='Big Media Critics Needn&apos;t Worry so Much'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-114857624409900285</id><published>2006-05-25T12:57:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-04-27T18:20:25.928-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Local Ownership for Philadelphia Newspapers Not Necessarily Good News-- Nor Bad News</title><summary type='text'>That faction of the universe that holds that big media conglomerates are bad for journalism should take no comfort in the announcement Tuesday that a group of Philadelphia investors will buy The Philadelphia Inquirer and Daily News from McClatchy, flipping it from the Knight-Ridder acquisition. The event is, by itself, neither positive nor negative.In some quarters there is a nostalgia for “local</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/114857624409900285/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=114857624409900285&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/114857624409900285'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/114857624409900285'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2006/05/local-ownership-for-philadelphia.html' title='Local Ownership for Philadelphia Newspapers Not Necessarily Good News-- Nor Bad News'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-114678928704064800</id><published>2006-05-04T20:34:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-03-02T22:44:56.165-05:00</updated><title type='text'>"Trust in Media" survey adds to data that no firms dominate U.S. news media</title><summary type='text'>The “Trust in Media” survey conducted by the BBC, Reuters and the Media Center released today has something in it for almost anyone. It found that the media were trusted a bit more than governments, Fox News was the most trusted news source in the U.S. Al Jazeera most trusted in the Middle East and the BBC (surprise?) most trusted globally. Blogs, says the report, are the least trusted form of </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/114678928704064800/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=114678928704064800&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/114678928704064800'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/114678928704064800'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2006/05/trust-in-media-survey-adds-to-data.html' title='&quot;Trust in Media&quot; survey adds to data that no firms dominate U.S. news media'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-114264981009972004</id><published>2006-03-17T21:43:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-01-02T21:55:52.928-05:00</updated><title type='text'>This week's FCC fines for indecent content of TV broadcasters just a cost of doing business</title><summary type='text'>You may have seen on Wednesday that the FCC fined CBS as well as some local broadcasters a total of  about $4 million for violations of decency standards. This included instances of violence as well as impermissible sex.Though the headlines were about the fines, the broader subtext is about equity: First Amendment equity. The larger issue is the double standard that is applied to broadcast </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/114264981009972004/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=114264981009972004&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/114264981009972004'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/114264981009972004'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2006/03/this-weeks-fcc-fines-for-indecent.html' title='This week&apos;s FCC fines for indecent content of TV broadcasters just a cost of doing business'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-114140790664112238</id><published>2006-03-03T12:45:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-03-03T15:12:37.693-05:00</updated><title type='text'>The "non-media monopoly" as seen by the smart money</title><summary type='text'>Among the worst performing publicly owned companies over the past three years are a collection of media companies, all associated with the popular misconception of “media monopoly.” This turns into an oxymoron when these so-called monopolies have such poor financial performance that they are among the bottom of the barrel among all sorts of competitive companies in other industries.The reason we </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/114140790664112238/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=114140790664112238&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/114140790664112238'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/114140790664112238'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2006/03/non-media-monopoly-as-seen-by-smart.html' title='The &quot;non-media monopoly&quot; as seen by the smart money'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-113908817748509698</id><published>2006-02-04T16:22:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-02-04T16:36:03.156-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Why Being Big  Means Little: The Lessons for Media Businesses from Western Union</title><summary type='text'>On January 27, 2006, Western Union sent its final telegram, 150 years after it sent its first. There’s a bit of a message for the media industry in this historical footnote.In the late 19th century and into the 1930s, Western Union was the pinnacle of the communications business. Indeed, believing that telegraph was the be all and end all of communications technology, Western Union turned down </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/113908817748509698/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=113908817748509698&amp;isPopup=true' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/113908817748509698'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/113908817748509698'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2006/02/why-being-big-means-little-lessons-for.html' title='Why Being Big  Means Little: The Lessons for Media Businesses from Western Union'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-113622513158645804</id><published>2006-01-02T13:03:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-01-11T20:35:51.921-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Is there a need for public broadcasting in the mega channel world?</title><summary type='text'>Is there a future for public broadcasting in the U.S.? Last month a blue ribbon panel headed by former Netscape CEO James Barksdale and former FCC Chairman Reed Hundt took a stab at addressing this in a report, “Digital Future Initiative: Challenges and Opportunities for Public Service Media in the Digital Age.”        As the title indicates, there are no dearth of challenges for public </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/113622513158645804/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=113622513158645804&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/113622513158645804'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/113622513158645804'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2006/01/is-there-need-for-public-broadcasting.html' title='Is there a need for public broadcasting in the mega channel world?'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-113458813713643442</id><published>2005-12-14T12:59:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2005-12-19T08:08:52.706-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Family Friendly cable package? Not so voluntary and not good policy</title><summary type='text'>Can an action be "voluntary" if one is coerced into taking the action? Adam Thierer has an insightful take on volunteerism as it applies to the recent announcement by the cable industry that it will offer so-called "family friendly" packages, or tier. I urge you to read his entire post. In brief:How voluntary is this action when Congress is making regulatory noises and the FCC is holding Time </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/113458813713643442/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=113458813713643442&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/113458813713643442'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/113458813713643442'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/12/family-friendly-cable-package-not-so.html' title='Family Friendly cable package? Not so voluntary and not good policy'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-113382488206488273</id><published>2005-12-05T18:03:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-01-03T13:21:32.964-05:00</updated><title type='text'>A la carte pricing for cable? A bad idea for diversity.</title><summary type='text'>It’s clearly silly season at the FCC. Among other things, they are chatting up unbundled pricing for the cable industry. A very bad idea. Who says so? Well. Steve Yelvington, for one, who is no lackey of the cable industry. And not just because it would undo the industry’s business model with little gain for consumers. No, the bigger issue is with the notion of diversity that the same self-styled</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/113382488206488273/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=113382488206488273&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/113382488206488273'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/113382488206488273'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/12/la-carte-pricing-for-cable-bad-idea.html' title='A la carte pricing for cable? A bad idea for diversity.'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-113054441550087258</id><published>2005-10-30T21:05:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-03-11T21:57:00.054-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Consolidation in Newspaper Industry is Inevitable, as Owners Make Strategic Decisions</title><summary type='text'>Earlier this month journalism professor and former Knight-Ridder journalist Phil Meyer published a column headlined “Newspapers can't maintain monopoly profits because they've lost their monopolies.” In it he voiced skepticism that attracting “young readers” is a viable resuscitation strategy for traditional newspapers. His compelling evidence went beyond the usual table that shows that 20-</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/113054441550087258/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=113054441550087258&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/113054441550087258'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/113054441550087258'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/10/consolidation-in-newspaper-industry-is.html' title='Consolidation in Newspaper Industry is Inevitable, as Owners Make Strategic Decisions'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-112864907318541180</id><published>2005-10-06T21:26:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-10-06T21:37:53.193-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Look for me at the Rebuilding Media blog</title><summary type='text'>Why so few entries to this blog lately? Thanks for asking.I've been asked to contribute to the Rebuilding Media blog I discovered a few months ago and wrote about here. That forum allows me to address a greater range of research and industry developments than does Who Owns the Media.I will continue to post here when I have some fresh data or some relevant observations. But if you are interested </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/112864907318541180/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=112864907318541180&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112864907318541180'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112864907318541180'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/10/look-for-me-at-rebuilding-media-blog.html' title='Look for me at the Rebuilding Media blog'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-112784580621231981</id><published>2005-09-27T14:26:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-10-06T21:25:54.096-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Academic  Research Confirms--and Undercuts-- FCC Media Regulation,  Deregulation</title><summary type='text'>I spent last weekend at the Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy (better known by its organizer’s initials,  TPRC) held at George Mason University Law School outside Washington. It was kicked off with a session featuring a rather heated discussion between two former FCC chairmen, Richard Wiley (from the Nixon era) and Reed Hundt (appointed by Pres. Clinton). </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/112784580621231981/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=112784580621231981&amp;isPopup=true' title='4 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112784580621231981'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112784580621231981'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/09/academic-research-confirms-and.html' title='Academic  Research Confirms--and Undercuts-- FCC Media Regulation,  Deregulation'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-112683413346462224</id><published>2005-09-15T21:14:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-09-15T21:33:38.180-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Advertising Trends Not Favorable for Old Media</title><summary type='text'>I wrote here last month about the battle for consumers’ attention among old media and new media. That’s only part of the problem.Ther battle for advertising dollars is more intense than ever, as an expanding menu of media forms and players vie for what is essentially a fixed pool of advertiser expenditures. Lots of folks are counting on advertising for survival, if not generous profits. </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/112683413346462224/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=112683413346462224&amp;isPopup=true' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112683413346462224'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112683413346462224'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/09/advertising-trends-not-favorable-for.html' title='Advertising Trends Not Favorable for Old Media'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-112602339920185705</id><published>2005-09-06T12:10:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-08-26T23:03:17.314-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Media Monopoly? Investors Don't Think So. Yet More Evidence of a Competitive Industry</title><summary type='text'>For anyone who still maintains there is anything even approaching a media monopoly among U.S. media, Adam Thierer and colleague Dan English put another notch in the empirical arsenal that blows away any such assertions. Taking yet another approach (beyond concentration ratios, audience market share, etc. etc.) Thierer and English examine the value that investors give the largest media </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/112602339920185705/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=112602339920185705&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112602339920185705'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112602339920185705'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/09/media-monopoly-investors-dont-think-so.html' title='Media Monopoly? Investors Don&apos;t Think So. Yet More Evidence of a Competitive Industry'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-112481000547463347</id><published>2005-08-23T11:11:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-05-01T21:18:55.966-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Even Largest Media Companies Could Disappear if they Don’t Adapt to Changing Consumer Usage. Does Anyone Remember Korevtte's? Bradlees? W.T. Grants?</title><summary type='text'>That the make-up and competitiveness of television has changed dramatically since the 1980s can be gleaned in the following list of the ten programs with the highest rating since Nielsen began measuring audiences. Only one of the ten is from the time since the start of the fourth network (Fox) in 1986 and that single event was part of the Winter Olympics from early 1994. Four of the 10 were from </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/112481000547463347/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=112481000547463347&amp;isPopup=true' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112481000547463347'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112481000547463347'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/08/even-largest-media-companies-could.html' title='Even Largest Media Companies Could Disappear if they Don’t Adapt to Changing Consumer Usage. Does Anyone Remember Korevtte&apos;s? Bradlees? W.T. Grants?'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-112438367514721152</id><published>2005-08-18T15:01:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-08-23T23:18:16.263-04:00</updated><title type='text'>"Rebuilding Media" Blog a Welcome Addition as a Forum for Discussing News Media Structure and Mission</title><summary type='text'>I want to call you attention to a new blog has been created at the Corante site called Rebuilding Media. It was organized by two journalists with impressive news and online credentials. Vin Crosbie, a fifth generation news man, was the first director of online publishing at News Corp. Robert Cauthorn is a former vice president of digital media at the San Francisco Chronicle and was the third </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/112438367514721152/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=112438367514721152&amp;isPopup=true' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112438367514721152'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112438367514721152'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/08/rebuilding-media-blog-welcome-addition.html' title='&quot;Rebuilding Media&quot; Blog a Welcome Addition as a Forum for Discussing News Media Structure and Mission'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-112377793144150518</id><published>2005-08-11T12:24:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-01-03T19:54:12.992-05:00</updated><title type='text'>FCC's DSL Ruling Will Help Spur Competition for Broadband "Last Mile"</title><summary type='text'>There’s been much ink and many bits written about the FCC’s unanimous decision last week largely freeing the telcos to wholesale their DSL service on their own terms—including not at all. This puts them on a level playing field with the cable operators, who were ruled to be freed of such wholesale requirements in the recent Brand X Supreme Court decision.Those who disagreed with the decision were</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/112377793144150518/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=112377793144150518&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112377793144150518'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112377793144150518'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/08/fccs-dsl-ruling-will-help-spur.html' title='FCC&apos;s DSL Ruling Will Help Spur Competition for Broadband &quot;Last Mile&quot;'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-112309379496083711</id><published>2005-08-03T14:24:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-11-08T11:33:16.462-05:00</updated><title type='text'>And the Largest National Radio Programming Network is....?</title><summary type='text'>Quick: What’s the largest group of uniformly programmed radio stations in the U.S.? Did you say Clear Channel? Wrong. Infinity? Wrong. The answer is….National Public Radio--NPR.Non-commercial radio has become a major media force. Primarily on the FM band, it has grown faster than the number of radio stations overall. Accounting for 6% of all stations in 1970, public radio stations multiplied in </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/112309379496083711/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=112309379496083711&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112309379496083711'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112309379496083711'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/08/and-largest-national-radio-programming.html' title='And the Largest National Radio Programming Network is....?'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-112233635424696317</id><published>2005-07-26T08:13:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-04-05T15:24:27.208-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Media Content is Becoming More Complex, More Socially Involving</title><summary type='text'>So much of what critics of media industry structure harp on is how the big media players dumb down the media. They’re only interested in earnings, goes the litany, so they pander to the lowest common denominator. We are becoming a nation of couch potatoes. Video games teach violence and take kids away from what they should be doing after school—homework and watching C-Span.Now along comes a book,</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/112233635424696317/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=112233635424696317&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112233635424696317'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112233635424696317'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/07/media-content-is-becoming-more-complex.html' title='Media Content is Becoming More Complex, More Socially Involving'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-112122098507350185</id><published>2005-07-13T08:15:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-07-21T14:09:17.243-04:00</updated><title type='text'>U.S. Has Most Diverse Media "in the World" Concludes Canadian Research Scholar in Harvard Study</title><summary type='text'>In most industries the central concern about the degree of competition is economic: the degree of pricing power that the players have. For the most part, the agenda behind the contentious issue of media ownership policies centers not on prices but around diversity of content. Except for the occasional mention of allegedly unchecked cable rates, we don’t hear people complaining about the pricing </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/112122098507350185/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=112122098507350185&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112122098507350185'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112122098507350185'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/07/us-has-most-diverse-media-in-world.html' title='U.S. Has Most Diverse Media &quot;in the World&quot; Concludes Canadian Research Scholar in Harvard Study'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-112061909900456872</id><published>2005-07-06T08:48:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-07-07T10:15:47.926-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Penn State Study Finds Media Diversity Fostered by Vigorous Media Entrepreneurship</title><summary type='text'>A new body of research just being developed appears to support the contention that the media industry is being driven by upstart entrepreneurs rather than by the staid big media companies. The research is in a formative stage. But if further work supports the findings to date it would bode well for the diversity and quality of the media.The research has been lead by Anne Hoag at the School of </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/112061909900456872/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=112061909900456872&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112061909900456872'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112061909900456872'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/07/penn-state-study-finds-media-diversity.html' title='Penn State Study Finds Media Diversity Fostered by Vigorous Media Entrepreneurship'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-112000409332723454</id><published>2005-06-29T08:13:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-06-29T10:46:05.440-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Analysis: Winners and Losers in the Supreme Court's ISP Broadband Ruling</title><summary type='text'>You’ve seen the basics of the Brand X case: Cable companies are not required to sell access to competing ISPs if that’s what the FCC so rules. And it is highly likely that the FCC will now level the playing field for DSL facilities of the telecos.So what does that mean? Who are the winners and losers?It’s not as obvious as it may at first seem.The self-styled consumerists are already complaining.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/112000409332723454/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=112000409332723454&amp;isPopup=true' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112000409332723454'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/112000409332723454'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/06/analysis-winners-and-losers-in-supreme.html' title='Analysis: Winners and Losers in the Supreme Court&apos;s ISP Broadband Ruling'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-111964332023974063</id><published>2005-06-24T15:30:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-01-04T14:56:26.500-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Demythification: The Urban Legend of Clear Channel's KCJB, Minot, ND</title><summary type='text'>This entry is a bit lengthy because I want to again address the need to employ fact and understanding to trump selective perception and social agenda mongering in determining media structure policy.I have no need or interest to come to the defense of any media company, large or small. They can carry their own water.But I do enjoy deflating urban legends. And much of what passes for “fact” or “</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/111964332023974063/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=111964332023974063&amp;isPopup=true' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111964332023974063'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111964332023974063'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/06/demythification-urban-legend-of-clear.html' title='Demythification: The Urban Legend of Clear Channel&apos;s KCJB, Minot, ND'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-111947714015261865</id><published>2005-06-22T17:38:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-06-22T17:57:19.933-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Major Internet Portals Shaping Up as True Competitors for "Television" Advertisers and Audiences</title><summary type='text'>Competition in television continues to heat up. Not only are the phone companies like Verizon busy implanting fiber optic cable to residences and lining up programming in their assault on the cable and DBS providers, but the Internet is building its video muscle as well. AOL, Microsoft and Yahoo, among others, are becoming serious media players. Although AOL is part of the largest of the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/111947714015261865/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=111947714015261865&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111947714015261865'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111947714015261865'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/06/major-internet-portals-shaping-up-as.html' title='Major Internet Portals Shaping Up as True Competitors for &quot;Television&quot; Advertisers and Audiences'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-111931429771495475</id><published>2005-06-20T20:23:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-06-20T20:51:26.853-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The Day the Courts Throw Out all FCC Ownership Regulations</title><summary type='text'>The Supreme Court announced last week that it would not review an Appeals Court ruling that instructed the FCC to come up with stronger justification for its media ownership rules. When the Third Circuit told the FCC to go back to the drawing board there was much crowing among those who favor 1950s regulation for a 21st century information landscape. This despite the fact that the Appeals Court </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/111931429771495475/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=111931429771495475&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111931429771495475'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111931429771495475'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/06/day-courts-throw-out-all-fcc-ownership.html' title='The Day the Courts Throw Out all FCC Ownership Regulations'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-111880473232769247</id><published>2005-06-15T09:08:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-06-15T20:18:02.990-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Love and Marriage: Viacom's Divorce is a Natural Part of Media Industry Evolution</title><summary type='text'>One of the wonderful things about documentation (whether text, aural or visual) is that it's akin to leaving a trail of breadcrumbs to find your way back to where you started. For those of us in the research and analysis business, it's a method for keeping score: what did you say, when did you say it and how accurate were you? However, most of the time it is too daunting to go back into volumes </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/111880473232769247/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=111880473232769247&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111880473232769247'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111880473232769247'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/06/love-and-marriage-viacoms-divorce-is.html' title='Love and Marriage: Viacom&apos;s Divorce is a Natural Part of Media Industry Evolution'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-111862418172275157</id><published>2005-06-13T21:59:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-06-13T10:02:57.550-04:00</updated><title type='text'>More Than 1000 New Periodicals Started in 2004 Indicates Robustness of Old Media</title><summary type='text'>With so much attention focused on electronic media and the Internet, we may lose sight of the robustness of older media, in particular magazine publishing. When last I checked for the 3rd edition of Who Owns the Media? there were nearly 12,000 different titles, ranging from mass circulation titles like Reader’s Digest to small political titles like The Nation and thousands of  titles aimed at </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/111862418172275157/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=111862418172275157&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111862418172275157'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111862418172275157'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/06/more-than-1000-new-periodicals-started.html' title='More Than 1000 New Periodicals Started in 2004 Indicates Robustness of Old Media'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-111859323039114252</id><published>2005-06-12T12:09:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-11-08T22:10:24.683-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Editorial Cartoon Captures Spirit of Peercasting</title><summary type='text'>I few weeks ago I posted an entry called Peercasting as the New Western Frontier. In short, it asks whether the easy access the Internet has created to self expression formats such as blogs and podcasting may not be providing the same sort of safety net for ideas and opinions as the Western frontier provided in the early 19th century for those seeking self-made opportunity.Clearly others are </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/111859323039114252/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=111859323039114252&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111859323039114252'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111859323039114252'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/06/editorial-cartoon-captures-spirit-of.html' title='Editorial Cartoon Captures Spirit of Peercasting'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-111809227450839328</id><published>2005-06-06T16:55:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-11-06T16:04:03.632-05:00</updated><title type='text'>For Decades Number of Radio Stations Grew, Advertising Declined, Ownership Caps Unchanged. What Would You Expect?</title><summary type='text'>I said on May 24 I’d get back to radio. For the small but vocal segment of the population that spends much time mulling about the media industry, the changes in the radio business in the past decade may seem to be immense. And it was, though only in the context of how little the industry changed structurally in the previous 70 years. The radio industry had seen only one or two “inflection points’</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/111809227450839328/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=111809227450839328&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111809227450839328'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111809227450839328'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/06/for-decades-number-of-radio-stations.html' title='For Decades Number of Radio Stations Grew, Advertising Declined, Ownership Caps Unchanged. What Would You Expect?'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-111808915944951349</id><published>2005-06-06T16:02:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-06-10T13:34:45.266-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Adam Thierer's New Book on Media Ownership Now Available</title><summary type='text'>Adam Thierer's much anticipated book, Media Myths: Making Sense Of The Debate Over Media Ownership has been published. It's a real tour d’force. He contends:No matter how large any given media outlet is today, it is ultimately just one of hundreds of sources of news, information, and entertainment that we have at our collective disposal," Thierer says. "It is just one voice in our contemporary </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/111808915944951349/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=111808915944951349&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111808915944951349'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111808915944951349'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/06/adam-thierers-new-book-on-media.html' title='Adam Thierer&apos;s New Book on Media Ownership Now Available'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-111750737714771784</id><published>2005-05-31T11:11:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-08-18T16:05:27.913-04:00</updated><title type='text'>A Critical Need for Restructuring the Media Industry Before It’s Too Late?</title><summary type='text'>Let me play Devil's Advocate here. An unintended consequence of the information technologies that have become widely available in the last two decades is a dangerous fragmentation of culture and community. Millions of blogs compete for our attention. We’re on the verge of hundreds of video options available via cable and satellite and the Internet. New players providing satellite radio are adding</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/111750737714771784/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=111750737714771784&amp;isPopup=true' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111750737714771784'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111750737714771784'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/critical-need-for-restructuring-media.html' title='A Critical Need for Restructuring the Media Industry Before It’s Too Late?'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-111722602390758472</id><published>2005-05-27T15:18:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-07-21T14:08:47.480-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Peercasting as the New Western Frontier</title><summary type='text'>I hope that somewhere along your educational path you were exposed to the seminal work of historian Frederick Jackson Turner. Perhaps to refresh your memory, in 1893 he presented his view that the key component to the unique American character of democracy was the settlement of the American West. That is, the availability of vast stretches of free land away from the initial settlements of the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/111722602390758472/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=111722602390758472&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111722602390758472'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111722602390758472'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/peercasting-as-new-western-frontier.html' title='Peercasting as the New Western Frontier'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-111695396368678548</id><published>2005-05-24T12:46:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-29T14:07:44.310-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Radio Redux: Radio Has Been Less Local Than You May Think</title><summary type='text'>In an article in last Sunday’s Boston Globe, Michele Hilmes, a professor of media and cultural studies at the University of Wisconsin, wrote how radio is being reinvigorated and reinvented by new methods of transmission such as the Internet, satellite and even podcasting. Her conclusion is very compatible with the discussion in my new study of the considerable robustness of the radio landscape, </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/111695396368678548/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=111695396368678548&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111695396368678548'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111695396368678548'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/radio-redux-radio-has-been-less-local.html' title='Radio Redux: Radio Has Been Less Local Than You May Think'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-111662014711989417</id><published>2005-05-20T16:08:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-29T14:26:35.156-04:00</updated><title type='text'>WOTM FAQ #3: Are the Media Monolithic? Can they Suppress the News?</title><summary type='text'>A FAQ series featuring some real questions I have answered from time to time.I received an email this week from a stranger. I reprint it below with my response. I hadn’t heard about the ”conspiracy” about the 10 Downing St. memo until I did some quick Googling about the issue. One of my first finds was an article by Washington Post ombudsman Michel Getler in which he noted that two self appointed</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/111662014711989417/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=111662014711989417&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111662014711989417'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111662014711989417'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/wotm-faq-3-are-media-monolithic-can.html' title='WOTM FAQ #3: Are the Media Monolithic? Can they Suppress the News?'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-111638084741787764</id><published>2005-05-18T07:30:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-18T07:33:35.326-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Media "Reform" Conference Finds Plenty of Media Available to Report on It</title><summary type='text'>A conference of a sort was held last weekend in &lt;?xml:namespace prefix = st1 /&gt;St. Louis called the National Conference on Media Reform to “mobilize to fix our broken media system.” According to the conference Web site, among its grievances are “shoddy journalism”, “government-funded propaganda,” and “corporate consolidation.”&lt;?xml:namespace prefix = o /&gt;In a column reporting on the event, </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/111638084741787764/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=111638084741787764&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111638084741787764'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111638084741787764'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/media-reform-conference-finds-plenty.html' title='Media &quot;Reform&quot; Conference Finds Plenty of Media Available to Report on It'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-111625623668202106</id><published>2005-05-16T11:05:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-29T14:33:02.630-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Optical Illusions and Media Ownership: A Lesson for Policymakers</title><summary type='text'>Many years ago I was returning from a trip through Canada’s Maritime Provinces when I stumbled on a tourist spot called Magnetic Hill. It was what looked to be simply a hill you could drive down. At the bottom, you put your car in neutral, released the brake– and the car rolled backward– seemingly up the hill. It was a disconcerting feeling and it certainly strained credulity.An enterprising </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/111625623668202106/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=111625623668202106&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111625623668202106'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111625623668202106'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/optical-illusions-and-media-ownership.html' title='Optical Illusions and Media Ownership: A Lesson for Policymakers'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-111584859058631919</id><published>2005-05-11T17:35:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-11-13T11:00:27.104-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Where are Newspapers at "Dominant" Media Companies?</title><summary type='text'>Quick: Name the three most influential newspapers in the United States today.Did you say The New York Times? The Washington Post? The Wall Street Journal? There may be one or two others: The L.A. Times; maybe, in its fashion, USA Today. Even in this age of falling newspaper circulation, these newspapers often set the agenda for what gets covered by the TV news operations. I can't count the number</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/111584859058631919/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=111584859058631919&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111584859058631919'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111584859058631919'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/where-are-newspapers-at-dominant-media.html' title='Where are Newspapers at &quot;Dominant&quot; Media Companies?'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-111575905462730453</id><published>2005-05-10T16:43:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-10T18:31:01.970-04:00</updated><title type='text'>"Bill of Media Rights" Further Decomposed</title><summary type='text'>Adam Thierer, in his Blog today, takes apart the underlying presumptions of those who hold that the First Amendment is fundamentally about the people's right of access to private media. The First Amendment "does not serve as an affirmative grant of access to privately owned media."Rather than repeat Adam's well reasoned and documented argument, you should read it for yourself. Even those who </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/111575905462730453/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=111575905462730453&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111575905462730453'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111575905462730453'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/bill-of-media-rights-further.html' title='&quot;Bill of Media Rights&quot; Further Decomposed'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-111568843245903948</id><published>2005-05-09T18:13:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-09T21:40:01.743-04:00</updated><title type='text'>"Bill of Media Rights" May Not Be What it Seems</title><summary type='text'>An advocacy group that calls itself the Media and Democracy Coalition held a news conference in Washington today to announce The Bill of Media Rights. The Preamble starts positively enough, proclaiming "A free and vibrant media, full of diverse and competing voices, is the lifeblood of America’s democracy and culture, as well as an engine of growth for its economy." No quibbles from me about this</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/111568843245903948/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=111568843245903948&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111568843245903948'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111568843245903948'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/bill-of-media-rights-may-not-be-what.html' title='&quot;Bill of Media Rights&quot; May Not Be What it Seems'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-111523737784761198</id><published>2005-05-04T15:09:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-29T14:21:28.870-04:00</updated><title type='text'>My New Study: "Media Monopoly Myth"</title><summary type='text'>The New Millennium Research Council released my newest study today, The Media Monopoly Myth: How New Competition is Expanding Our  Sources of Information and Entertainment.Consistent with my findings over the past 25 years, it provides new empirical data that undercuts the myth that U.S. media ownership is over concentrated today. The study finds that fears about media control have reached the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/111523737784761198/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=111523737784761198&amp;isPopup=true' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111523737784761198'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/111523737784761198'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/my-new-study-media-monopoly-myth.html' title='My New Study: &quot;Media Monopoly Myth&quot;'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-110632722361002866</id><published>2005-01-21T11:57:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-02-05T11:08:06.006-05:00</updated><title type='text'>WOTM FAQ, Part 2</title><summary type='text'>Some real questions I have answered from time to time, often from students writing papers who e-mail me for some primary research points.How ethical is it for corporations who own media to try to make a profit?Ethical? Ethical? Profit is not a matter of ethics. A newspaper never went out of business for lack of content, but only for lack of revenue to pay a staff an acceptable wage, mainatin its </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/110632722361002866/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=110632722361002866&amp;isPopup=true' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/110632722361002866'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/110632722361002866'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/01/wotm-faq-part-2.html' title='WOTM FAQ, Part 2'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-110480250279299549</id><published>2005-01-03T20:34:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2005-05-16T11:53:13.453-04:00</updated><title type='text'>WOTM FAQ, Part 1</title><summary type='text'>Some questions I have answered from time to time, often from students writing papers who e-mail me for some primary research points. Is there bias in the news media today?&lt;?xml:namespace prefix = o /&gt;First, see Bernard Goldberg’s books, Bias and Arrogance. Goldberg, a long-time CBS News reporter, provides dozens of examples of bias. Crucial, though, he believes it is not institutional, i.e., </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/110480250279299549/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=110480250279299549&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/110480250279299549'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/110480250279299549'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2005/01/wotm-faq-part-1.html' title='WOTM FAQ, Part 1'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-110204773024218557</id><published>2004-12-03T23:22:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2005-05-29T14:19:09.366-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The Technology Liberation Front: Senate hearing / testimony on media ownership</title><summary type='text'>[This was posted by Adam Thierer at  The Technology Liberation Front blog on September 28, 2004]The Senate Commerce Committee held a hearing today on media ownership regulation and I was invited to testify. Here's the link to my [Adam's] testimony.All the charts and tables you will see in the appendix of my testimony will appear in my forthcoming book Media Myths: Making Sense of the Debate over </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/110204773024218557/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=110204773024218557&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/110204773024218557'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/110204773024218557'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2004/12/technology-liberation-front-senate.html' title='The Technology Liberation Front: Senate hearing / testimony on media ownership'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-110204606966901543</id><published>2004-12-02T22:45:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2005-05-29T14:17:03.346-04:00</updated><title type='text'>More Competition or Less in TV? You Decide</title><summary type='text'>The debate on media competition constantly keep returning to television. Yeah, there's a declining newspaper industry and a robust radio business. There are thousands of book and magazine publishers. Oh yeah, the Internet. But the 600 pounds gorilla in the room is always television.So lets look at what really matters in TV land, eyeballs.Over the period 1960 to 1980, there commercial broadcast </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/110204606966901543/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=110204606966901543&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/110204606966901543'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/110204606966901543'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2004/12/more-competition-or-less-in-tv-you.html' title='More Competition or Less in TV? You Decide'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9434969.post-110204503636357106</id><published>2004-12-02T22:34:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2004-12-05T22:23:40.176-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Competition and the Media</title><summary type='text'>About this BlogThis forum is about media ownership and competition. Notice I don't say media concentration. They are two sides of the coin. As more competition is generally viewed as better than less, I favor speaking about the degree of competition in the media industry.It is also about empirical data on the subject. It seeks to add to an informed debate. Not one based on anecdotal stories </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/feeds/110204503636357106/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9434969&amp;postID=110204503636357106&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/110204503636357106'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9434969/posts/default/110204503636357106'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wotmedia.blogspot.com/2004/12/competition-and-media.html' title='Competition and the Media'/><author><name>Ben Compaine</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09063871802006721989</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://compaine.bcompany.com/bc_smallbio.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
